O
North Ridgeville
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

Heron Ridge Subdivision

North Ridgeville

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (8)Concerned (2)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
11
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Apr 20, 2026.

Public comments (11)

OpposedAlbert CraigApr 20, 2026

Opposed the Sugar Ridge Road subdivision, calling it a 'shoehorn' development that will raise taxes, strain fire/police/ambulance services, crowd schools, flood a neighboring farmer's fields and add roughly 200 cars without a traffic study.

City Council - Apr 20, 2026 · 3:12 →
NeutralTony VicanteApr 20, 2026

Attorney for the developer asked council to table the item, arguing the preliminary plan vote is quasi-judicial and the proper process is unclear.

City Council - Apr 20, 2026 · 5:31 →
OpposedCurtis LindenApr 14, 2026

Fourth-generation farmer who owns land around the site said his property will never be for sale, objected to retention ponds attracting geese, and warned that power line failures across Sugar Ridge Road could cut off emergency access to 51 homes.

Planning Commission - Apr 14, 2026 · 35:36 →
OpposedDan BainbridgeApr 14, 2026

Lives closest to the site; asked that the entrance be relocated away from his property and that a buffer such as fencing or landscaping protect his family's privacy and safety.

Planning Commission - Apr 14, 2026 · 38:38 →
OpposedAlbert KrageApr 14, 2026

Urged the city to slow or stop residential development, citing traffic, speeding, rising service costs, school crowding, water and sewer capacity, and loss of farmland; suggested the land be used for a cemetery instead.

Planning Commission - Apr 14, 2026 · 41:23 →
OpposedHolly A. SwenkApr 14, 2026

Said she's received about five complaints that the developer's nearby Eagle Meadows subdivision has unfinished common areas, poor pond banks, and no Bender Road sidewalks, and raised school capacity concerns.

Planning Commission - Apr 14, 2026 · 46:08 →
OpposedCarol NagelApr 14, 2026

An out-of-town partial property owner adjacent to the site, 100% opposed, citing roughly 100 additional vehicles on a congested road, failing streets, overcrowded schools, and stretched EMS.

Planning Commission - Apr 14, 2026 · 47:34 →
ConcernedBernard GarciaApr 14, 2026

Questioned why commercial projects like Meijer move slower than housing, asked about public input on the city industrial park and data center rules, and proposed work on the west gateway at Route 10/83.

Planning Commission - Apr 14, 2026 · 49:32 →
OpposedBradley BakerApr 14, 2026

Asked whether a 51-lot project near the 25-acre minimum is a way to dodge rules that apply to bigger developments and whether limits could be circumvented by phasing.

Planning Commission - Apr 14, 2026 · 54:04 →
ConcernedKathryn RogersonApr 14, 2026

Asked for the zoning history of the property, noting rumors it was once considered for commercial or light industrial use.

Planning Commission - Apr 14, 2026 · 55:36 →
OpposedKim StermoleApr 14, 2026

A 40-year resident who feels squeezed by development on all sides; worried about property values, dust, runoff, wildlife, and being unable to relocate at her stage of life.

Planning Commission - Apr 14, 2026 · 57:31 →