Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (1)Neutral (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 26, 2026.
Public comments (2)
OpposedNicole Rambo AckermanMar 26, 2026
Said the applicant never explained a hardship — 'you don't need a porch to live' — and argued he still hasn't redesigned to truly comply with the code.
Board of Zoning and Building Appeals - Mar 26, 2026 · 26:59 →NeutralRihanna GoleMar 26, 2026
Asked for clarification on a typo — the hearing notice said the rear setback figure was 31.36 feet when the correct variance figure is about 5 feet.
Board of Zoning and Building Appeals - Mar 26, 2026 · 28:14 →