Sugar Ridge Road project

Asked council to formally pause the Sugar Ridge Road project after the November 27 comment deadline, citing truck-route contradictions, the 10-foot path, tree removal and missing engineering details.

A 21-year resident worried about her privacy, frontage and horse-farm community being taken for the path and road widening.

Ran an informal door-to-door poll finding overwhelming opposition; called the path and roundabout wasteful spending and urged returning the grant money.

Said all 94 affected homes oppose the path; questioned its connectivity value and asked council to listen to residents, not tell them what is best.

A 40-year resident said the path is a waste of federal money that doesn't fit the neighborhood's rural character; questioned survey claims of resident support.

Opposed the path, noting his front porch is 30 feet from the roadway and citing privacy concerns for his newborn.

Asked the city to not build the road to a commercial truck-capable standard and noted the 10-foot path exceeds the 8-foot path it would connect to.

Submitted petitions with 79 signatures against truck-capable design and 72 against the multi-use path from the 94 affected homes.

A 41-year resident praised the street's farms and rural character and asked the city to leave it alone.

Said widening the road increases speed and worried about trucks endangering children; asked for a simple grind-and-fix repave.